Acer Switch 10 - A Windows laptop... or tablet

The Acer Switch 10 is a Windows 8 convertible laptop that can be used as either a laptop or tablet. The laptop mode is a typical clamshell design, but the screen can be easily detached by simply pulling it apart from the keyboard base allowing you to use it as a tablet. The screen is held to the keyboard using magnets. The connection is quite strong, and you can pick up and hold the laptop by the screen without the keyboard coming loose. Acer advertises two other modes as well, but I am hard pressed to think of examples where I would use them. The first is in a "tent" position with the screen facing out. The second is similar to the standard clamshell configuration, but having the screen facing away from the keyboard.

Obviously to function as a tablet, the Switch has a touch screen. The screen is bright, and uses a light sensor to adjust the brightness setting automatically. It was easy to read the screen in a variety of indoor lighting conditions, including a classroom. Although not the highest resolution screen (1280 x 800), there is enough detail to be productive. Touch accuracy was quite good, even when in Windows Desktop mode. I had little difficulty interacting with window controls (minimize, resize, move), or clicking on buttons, links, or other user interface elements.

As mentioned, the keyboard connects to the screen magnetically and holds quite well. This is partly due to the use of strong magnets, and partly because the keyboard is very light. The disadvantage to the weight of the screen versus keyboard is that if the screen is open too far, the laptop will tip over. If using the touch screen, the laptop doesn't need to be open very far to have a touch tip it over.

The keys on the keyboard are necessarily small with little key travel. Touch typists will find the keyboard uncomfortable, but students accustomed to using on-screen keyboards will have little trouble adapting.

The overall size of the Switch 10 is similar to an iPad though thicker (even without the keyboard). I was able to use the Switch with an iPad document camera stand, and it fits easily in our storage units for the iPads. It is heavier than an iPad, especially an iPad Air, but similar to many of the entry level Chromebooks.

The included storage is extremely small (32GB) for a Windows device. You will quickly run out of space once you start installing Windows applications, but there are options for file and media storage via a micro SD slot and USB port.

The Switch has 2GB of RAM and a quad-core Intel Atom processor. It is unfortunate that Intel continued with the Atom name for these newer CPU's. Many people recall the name from the netbook days and associate it with terrible performance. These newer Atom processors are far more competent (although still far from being fast). I installed SMART Notebook 14 and was able to open and use a fairly large Notebook file. I also installed the newest version of AirServer with Miracast support and successfully mirrored an Android device along with two iOS devices to the Switch. In general I was impressed with the performance but still would never recommend this class of device for any serious media editing.

I did have some issues with the Switch. Screen rotation was inconsistent and did not always automatically rotate when holding the tablet in portrait. Oddly auto rotation was most consistent when the keyboard was attached (and you are least likely to want to rotate it).

There is a full-size USB port on the keyboard base and I believe that is what caused Windows to complain (did not safely remove device) every time I disconnected the keyboard. The system froze on me a few times, and it seemed most likely when detaching the keyboard.

One other area of concern is durability. I always recommend a case for tablets but finding a case for the Switch will be a lot more difficult than finding one for an iPad or Samsung tablet. The Switch didn't feel fragile, but it didn't feel like it would survive a drop to the classroom floor either. The screen does make use of Gorilla Glass 3, so it is at least scratch resistant.

The Switch 10 costs less than $400, putting it in the same territory as the iPad and some Chromebooks. I think it is a compelling alternative. You are still able to run Chrome apps without losing the ability to run Windows programs. I was hoping to get it to boot Android-x86 but was unsuccessful in the limited time I had. Overall, I think Acer (and Microsoft) have a tough sell in the classroom. The Windows Store has little compelling to offer compared to the App Store or Google Play, and falls well short in terms of the number of available apps. However, if your school or district still uses a lot of Windows applications, the Switch 10 could be a good, low-cost choice.

Airserver Universal - iOS, Android, and Windows Wireless Mirroring

I have been searching for a software-based Miracast solution for quite some time. iOS and AirPlay have had Reflector, AirServer, and more, but mirroring from Android or Windows has required a hardware Miracast receiver.

This past summer Microsoft released updates to Windows 8.1 with some promising comments about using Windows as a Miracast receiver. The updates enabled the capability, but didn't add the actual receiver; that was up to developers and needed updated hardware drivers.

Then at the end of October AirServer announced AirServer Universal, a new version adding Miracast to their existing AirPlay receiver software. There are some specific requirements to get it working. Unfortunately for Mac users, this only works with Windows 8.1. Your computer must also have a network device with a new NDIS 6.40 device driver. If you don't have a supported network chip, you can simply add the Asus USB-AC56 adapter. The combined price of the adapter and AirServer is under $100. I also installed AirServer on a sub-$400 Acer Switch 10 convertible laptop and was satisfied with the performance, even with two iPads (2nd generation) connected along with a Nexus 5. The Switch 10 did not require the Asus adapter.

AirServer has worked well as a Miracast receiver with every device I have tried, including a Nexus 5, Nexus 7 (2013), Nvidia Tegra Note 7, and Acer Switch 10 Windows 8 convertible laptop. Miracast connections from the Nexus devices did take longer to establish than other devices, and initially appeared to have significant input lag, but it improves fairly quickly. I created a video showing the Nexus 5 used alongside an iPad 3, connecting with a Nexus 7, and a game. The audio in the game is choppy, but that has been true with every Miracast receiver I have used. One interesting discovery is that I had to use the Asus USB-AC56 to get the Miracast capability of AirServer installed, but then was able to just use my laptop's existing wireless chip. I removed the Asus adapter completely and was still able to connect from the Nexus 5, Tegra Note, and Acer Switch. The Nexus 7 still saw AirServer as a receiver but it wouldn't connect unless I used the Asus adapter.

In addition to the system requirements, there are other limitations. AirServer only supports one Miracast device at a time. You can still have multiple iOS devices along with that single Miracast device. AirServer says support for multiple Miracast devices is coming. The other limitation is actually a Miracast issue more than a problem with AirServer. A device sending a Miracast signal will always send a landscape image. If your screen is in portrait mode, the device will rotate it and convert it to landscape before sending it to AirServer. If that is the only device being mirrored, it's not a problem. It is a problem when sharing the screen with an iOS device. In those situations the Miracast screen appears smaller than the iOS screen (as seen in the video linked above). AirServer may implement a workaround in a future update but isn't making any promises.

While not perfect, Airserver Universal is a step in the right direction for enabling a true BYOD environment.

Newer is not always better - Livescribe 3

Last week was the final full-day session with our Ed Tech Leadership teacher candidates. One of the educational technologies we looked at was the Livescribe Echo Smartpen. We have had these pens for a few years now, and it's pretty amazing how they have held up, technology-wise.

I also demonstrated (or tried to demonstrate) a Livescribe 3 Smartpen, the newest model of Livescribe's smartpens. The updates from the pen/paper to the iPad screen were anything but fluid. Some short, simple writing took a few minutes to show up on the iPad's screen (ok, maybe it only felt that way when standing in front of a class, but the delay was ridiculous). The Livescribe 3 also lacks the built-in microphone and speaker found in the older Echo models, requiring the iPad to handle those functions. In fact, without the iPad, the Livescribe 3 really isn't anything but a pen.

It's hard to believe that the Livescribe 3 isn't just a newer model, but also a more expensive model. The Echo smartpens were pretty incredible devices, out of the box, even without connecting them to a computer. It could record and play back audio, act as a calculator using the printed calculator in the front cover of the notebook, and even included a "piano" app to play with. Connect it to the computer, install some more apps, and you have an even more amazing device. The Livescribe 3 can't do any of those things.

Perhaps there's something more to the Livescribe 3 that I'm missing, but I don't think so. It is worse than its predecessor in almost every way, adding only one tiny feature (bluetooth), and yet it costs roughly $20 more, not to mention the required added expense of an iPad. Oh, and if you think you can use your iPad 2 (which is extremely common in schools), you're out of luck. The iPad 3rd generation or newer is required.

Creating a Private Cloud with Pydio

In my previous post I talked about FreeNAS, the open-source Network Attached Storage solution. We used it to create a large storage pool for our faculty, staff, and students. Creating a storage pool is just one part of the challenge. The other, more important part, is how do you make all of that storage easily available?

A couple of years ago a member of another IT group at the university talked about Pydio (known then as Ajaxplorer). I started investigating and found that it could do many of the things we wanted, but there were some issues with how it handled authentication in one of its features. Our university uses Active Directory for authentication, and although Pydio supported AD, one particular feature of Pydio that we wanted to use did not. This meant users would have to create a separate, non-AD password to use that feature.

Fortunately Pydio is also open-source, so I set out to modify it to work the way we needed it to. The changes I submitted have now been integrated into Pydio, so it works very well in our AD environment.

Pydio (Put Your Data In Orbit) is a private cloud storage solution that uses PHP and MySQL. From an admin perspective, it is very easy to get up and running. On the user side, it features a web-based drag-and-drop interface with multiple file and folder sharing options. Users can share with other internal users, setting per-user access permissions. They can also share with external users by URL (web link), optionally with a password.

There are free Pydio apps for iOS and Android, and it even supports the WebDAV protocol (used by various apps and allows for desktop network share folders).

Once we had Pydio up and running, we started rolling it out to small test groups to make sure it would work as expected. One of the first "signs of success" we had was that the users in the test groups were encouraging other users to start using Pydio. We were very happy that our users wanted to use Pydio.

Pydio is in active development, and continues to get better. The combination of Pydio and FreeNAS is a great, inexpensive way to create a private cloud storage solution.

FreeNAS with the Supermicro SuperServer 6027R-72RF

It seems there's never enough storage. To address growing storage needs within our faculty, we looked at various storage solutions. FreeNAS, an open-source solution, stood out because our unit works with a razor thin budget. We ordered our first FreeNAS system last year.

This year we looked at building another FreeNAS system for our satellite campus to use as an off site backup of the primary system. FreeNAS uses the ZFS file system and can easily replicate one system to another. The off site system provides a good level of protection and redundancy. Should the main server fail, the secondary server can take over.

The first step was to spec and build the hardware. We looked at brand name systems, but the prices all quickly scaled beyond our budget once we added the RAM and storage space we desired. FreeNAS recommends 1GB of RAM for each terabyte of storage, and we wanted lots of storage. The configurations we looked at all ended up being over $8,000, with some of the high-storage options going over $10,000.

We decided to look at building our own system.

After a little shopping, I came across the Supermicro 6027R-72RF 2U barebones server. It has 8 SAS/SATA III hot-swap drive bays, SCSI SAS controller with SAS expander backplane, a dual socket Xeon motherboard, redundant power supply, CPU heatsinks, fans, and integrated video. Pretty much everything you need other than CPU, RAM, and hard drives. This nearly complete system was just under $1,600!

We added in a 6-core/12-thread Xeon processor, 32GB of ECC RAM, and 8 4TB Western Digital RE (RAID Edition) hard drives, and the grand total was just under $5,800 CDN (before tax). It would have almost been possible to order two of these systems for the same price as a similarly spec'ed brand name server.

Putting all of the parts together was a breeze. The whole system was assembled and booting up FreeNAS in just a few hours.

Of course, things weren't going to be perfect. :)

The support from FreeNAS of the integrated SCSI chip was pretty much non-existent. The recommendation from the FreeNAS forums was to purchase another SCSI card. Despite the information in the forums, I had no trouble running the drives in the proper JBOD mode. The biggest challenge seemed to be FreeNAS' lack of integrated support for monitoring the health of the hard drives. From what I could tell, this support is in the mfip.ko module in FreeBSD (the OS FreeNAS is based on), but that module isn't in FreeNAS.

FreeNAS does include the MegaCli utility which can be used to read a lot of information from the drives, including the SMART values. FreeNAS also has an alert system based on Python scripts. It was relatively easy to write a custom script to monitor the health of the hard drives and use FreeNAS' integrated alert system.

The system has been up and running solidly for a few months now. The next topic will describe how we're letting our users take advantage of the extra space.

Ergotron Tablet Management Cart

When we first acquired a set of iPads for use in our program, we re-purposed a laptop cart to hold and charge the iPads. The cart was quite large and heavy. There were two built-in power bars, and a total of 28 outlets. Unfortunately, we had 30 iPads. To make matters worse, the iPads had to be individually unplugged and connected to a computer for syncing, then plugged back into a power bar for charging. I also had to make sure I unplugged or plugged in both power bar cords whenever I moved the cart. Charging and managing the iPads was very time consuming and needed to be done regularly.

I discovered Ergotron at a conference where they were demonstrating their tablet management cart. They described that the cart integrated a USB hub and could be used for charging and syncing.

We decided to order a 2-cabinet "ISI" model of the cart. There are a few different models of the cart. There are carts with either 2 or 3 cabinets, and each cabinet holds up to 16 tablets. The ISI models have individual status indicators; LEDs that show the status of each tablet. There is one LED per slot. The LED will be off if no tablet is plugged in, orange if the tablet is connected and charging, and green if the device is charged. This simple feature is very useful for making sure all tablets are charged and ready for the school day.

The cart is very compact considering the number of tablets it can hold. There is a shelf on the bottom (only on the 2-cabinet model), and the top is well suited for placing a laptop on. We secured a Macbook to the top that is both for syncing the iPads and for general classroom use. We use a rubber tub on the bottom for holding cables and other accessories like the hand straps for our iPad cases.

The slots that hold the iPads are large enough to accommodate the iPads in their cases, but not with the hand straps attached (we use the Sleeve360 iPad cases). The design is clearly meant for tablets, and will not hold larger devices like Chromebooks.

Prior to use, the cart needs to be "cabled up" with the syncing cables. This process was a bit of a hassle, but not difficult. Two screws secure each USB hub (one hub per cabinet) to the cabinet. You then pull the hub forward until you can disconnect the data and power plug from the back. The back of the hub has standard USB ports for the sync cables, and brackets for wrapping extra cord length around. There is a model that is pre-cabled with Lightning connectors that costs $400 extra. If you can use the cables that came with your iPads, save yourself the $400 and do the cabling yourself. If you need spare cables, $400 is actually a pretty good deal.

The USB hubs integrated in the cart provide enough power to charge all connected tablets. What is more impressive is that when the USB plug from the cart is connected to a computer, the hubs switch to sync mode allowing all connected iPads to sync with iTunes or Apple Configurator. The hubs work in tandem, so there is just a single USB plug from the cart to the the computer. This feature is what makes this a "management cart" rather than just a storage cart. It has made it significantly easier to manage the iPads, and has saved me a considerable amount of time.

There is no question that you will need something to store and transport your tablets in. If you have 10 or fewer tablets, it is worth looking at something like the Copernicus Tech Tub. If you are using a full class set of tablets, the Ergotron cart is a much better solution. The purchase price might initially seem high, but the cost per device is as low as $75 for the 32 tablet cart with ISI. When considering the value of the time the cart will save in deploying and managing iPads, the decision should be fairly easy to make. We purchased another Ergotron 32 tablet management cart to have one at both of our campuses.

Copernicus Dewey Document Camera Stand

Many people have learned how to use their tablet as a document camera in the classroom. In fact, there are many advantages to using a tablet rather than a dedicated document camera.

If you already have a laptop connected to a projector in your classroom, check out Reflector or Airserver. They will let you mirror your iPad screen to your computer wirelessly using AirPlay. To make it a document camera, just fire up the camera app. Better yet, use an app that lets you take a picture with the iPad's camera then mark it up with drawings and shapes. Document cameras often have SD card slots for transferring pictures to a computer, but if you use an iPad you can store pictures on it and share them in any number of ways. The only issue with using your iPad as a document camera is having to hold it.

The Copernicus Dewey document camera stand is designed to let you use your iPad as a document camera, hands-free. It is a metal stand with a fairly wide base, so it is very sturdy but light enough to move around a classroom easily. It has three adjustable height settings. I wish the height adjustment was more flexible and didn't require both hands, but that is a very minor complaint. The mount holding the iPad will hold an iPad with or without a case. The mount rotates and pivots, so it makes a great iPad stand to use for viewing notes or to use with Skype, Hangouts, or FaceTime. I took a quick video of it.

Perhaps the biggest drawback to the Dewey is that it is designed for the larger iPads. It will not hold smaller tablets like the iPad Mini.

The Dewey is less than $100, so if you already have an iPad 2 or newer, a stand like this makes more sense than a dedicated document camera.